<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Issue 477: Operator-> for const forward iterators</title>
<meta property="og:title" content="Issue 477: Operator-> for const forward iterators">
<meta property="og:description" content="C++ library issue. Status: Dup">
<meta property="og:url" content="https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue477.html">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:image" content="http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/images/cpp_logo.png">
<meta property="og:image:alt" content="C++ logo">
<style>
  p {text-align:justify}
  li {text-align:justify}
  pre code.backtick::before { content: "`" }
  pre code.backtick::after { content: "`" }
  blockquote.note
  {
    background-color:#E0E0E0;
    padding-left: 15px;
    padding-right: 15px;
    padding-top: 1px;
    padding-bottom: 1px;
  }
  ins {background-color:#A0FFA0}
  del {background-color:#FFA0A0}
  table.issues-index { border: 1px solid; border-collapse: collapse; }
  table.issues-index th { text-align: center; padding: 4px; border: 1px solid; }
  table.issues-index td { padding: 4px; border: 1px solid; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(1) { text-align: right; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(2) { text-align: left; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(3) { text-align: left; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(4) { text-align: left; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(5) { text-align: center; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(6) { text-align: center; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(7) { text-align: left; }
  table.issues-index td:nth-child(5) span.no-pr { color: red; }
  @media (prefers-color-scheme: dark) {
     html {
        color: #ddd;
        background-color: black;
     }
     ins {
        background-color: #225522
     }
     del {
        background-color: #662222
     }
     a {
        color: #6af
     }
     a:visited {
        color: #6af
     }
     blockquote.note
     {
        background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, .10)
     }
  }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<hr>
<p><em>This page is a snapshot from the LWG issues list, see the <a href="lwg-active.html">Library Active Issues List</a> for more information and the meaning of <a href="lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a> status.</em></p>
<h3 id="477"><a href="lwg-closed.html#477">477</a>. Operator-> for const forward iterators</h3>
<p><b>Section:</b> 24.3.5.5 <a href="https://wg21.link/forward.iterators">[forward.iterators]</a> <b>Status:</b> <a href="lwg-active.html#Dup">Dup</a>
 <b>Submitter:</b> Dave Abrahams <b>Opened:</b> 2004-07-11 <b>Last modified:</b> 2016-01-28</p>
<p><b>Priority: </b>Not Prioritized
</p>
<p><b>View all other</b> <a href="lwg-index.html#forward.iterators">issues</a> in [forward.iterators].</p>
<p><b>View all issues with</b> <a href="lwg-status.html#Dup">Dup</a> status.</p>
<p><b>Duplicate of:</b> <a href="lwg-defects.html#478" title="Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r->m? (Status: CD1)">478</a></p>
<p><b>Discussion:</b></p>
<p>
The Forward Iterator requirements table contains the following:
</p>
<pre>
 expression  return type         operational  precondition
                                  semantics
  ==========  ==================  ===========  ==========================
  a->m        U&amp; if X is mutable, (*a).m       pre: (*a).m is well-defined.
              otherwise const U&amp;

  r->m        U&amp;                  (*r).m       pre: (*r).m is well-defined.
</pre>

<p>
The first line is exactly right.  The second line is wrong.  Basically
it implies that the const-ness of the iterator affects the const-ness
of referenced members.  But Paragraph 11 of [lib.iterator.requirements] says:
</p>

<blockquote><p>
   In the following sections, a and b denote values of type const X, n
   denotes a value of the difference type Distance, u, tmp, and m
   denote identifiers, r denotes a value of X&amp;, t denotes a value of
   value type T, o denotes a value of some type that is writable to
   the output iterator.
</p></blockquote>

<p>AFAICT if we need the second line at all, it should read the same
as the first line.</p>

<p>Related issue: <a href="lwg-defects.html#478" title="Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r->m? (Status: CD1)">478</a><sup><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue478" title="Latest snapshot">(i)</a></sup></p>


<p id="res-477"><b>Proposed resolution:</b></p>


<p><b>Rationale:</b></p>
<p>The LWG agrees that this is a real problem.  Marked as a DUP
  because the LWG chose to adopt the solution proposed in
  <a href="lwg-defects.html#478" title="Should forward iterator requirements table have a line for r->m? (Status: CD1)">478</a><sup><a href="https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue478" title="Latest snapshot">(i)</a></sup>.
</p>





</body>
</html>
